Description

This track shows multiple alignments of 11 primate assemblies on this target/reference assembly (western lowland gorilla - 2024-01-08 - National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health).

The multiple alignments were generated using multiz and other tools in the UCSC/Penn State Bioinformatics comparative genomics alignment pipeline.

count alignment
percent
assembly and
browser link
maf file
type
common name/assembly date
assembly submitter
01 81.301 hg38 syntenic net Human/hg38/Dec. 2013 (GRCh38/hg38)/GRCh38 Genome Reference Consortium Human Reference 38 (GCA_000001405.15)
02 81.201 hs1 syntenic net Human/hs1/Jan. 2022 (T2T CHM13v2.0/hs1)/Telomere to telomere (T2T) assembly of haploid CHM13 + chrY (GCA_009914755.4)
03 79.907 GCA_029289425.2 syntenic net pygmy chimpanzee/2024-01-08/NHGRI/NIH
04 79.878 GCA_028858775.2 syntenic net chimpanzee/2024-01-08/NHGRI/NIH
05 79.307 GCA_028885655.2 syntenic net Sumatran orangutan/2024-01-05/NHGRI/NIH
06 79.288 GCA_028885625.2 syntenic net Bornean orangutan/2024-01-08/NHGRI/NIH
07 75.635 GCA_028878055.2 syntenic net siamang/2024-01-05/NHGRI/NIH
08 59.789 GCF_011100555.1 maf net white-tufted-ear marmoset/2021-04-28/VGP
09 28.119 GCF_020740605.2 maf net Ring-tailed lemur/2021-11-04/VGP
10 13.212 GCF_027406575.1 maf net slow loris/2022-12-28/VGP

Alignments identity

showing percent identity, how much of the target is matched by the query
chainssyntenicreciprocal
best
lift
over
common
name
assembly
81.30180.59777.71081.230Humanhg38
81.20180.60177.81581.160Humanhs1
79.90779.39677.60579.881pygmy chimpanzeeGCA_029289425.2
79.87879.39177.62579.854chimpanzeeGCA_028858775.2
79.30778.44375.40579.262Sumatran orangutanGCA_028885655.2
79.28878.38975.38979.243Bornean orangutanGCA_028885625.2
75.63574.62171.27275.585siamangGCA_028878055.2
59.78958.57156.55759.715white-tufted-ear marmosetGCF_011100555.1
28.11927.30626.90228.089Ring-tailed lemurGCF_020740605.2
13.21212.42312.62113.189slow lorisGCF_027406575.1

Display Conventions and Configuration

In full and pack display modes, conservation scores are displayed as a wiggle track (histogram) in which the height reflects the size of the score. The conservation wiggles can be configured in a variety of ways to highlight different aspects of the displayed information. Click the Graph configuration help link for an explanation of the configuration options.

Methods

Pairwise alignments of each species to the western lowland gorilla//hive/data/genomes/asmHubs/genbankBuild/GCA/029/281/585/GCA_029281585.2_NHGRI_mGorGor1-v2.0_pri/html/GCA_029281585.2_NHGRI_mGorGor1-v2.0_pri.names.tab/GCA_029281585.2/2024-01-08 genome are displayed below the conservation histogram as a grayscale density plot (in pack mode) or as a wiggle (in full mode) that indicates alignment quality. In dense display mode, conservation is shown in grayscale using darker values to indicate higher levels of overall conservation as scored by phastCons.

Checkboxes on the track configuration page allow selection of the species to include in the pairwise display. Note that excluding species from the pairwise display does not alter the the conservation score display.

To view detailed information about the alignments at a specific position, zoom the display in to 30,000 or fewer bases, then click on the alignment.

Credits

This track was created using the following programs:

References

Harris RS. Improved pairwise alignment of genomic DNA. Ph.D. Thesis. Pennsylvania State University, USA. 2007.

PhyloP:

Cooper GM, Stone EA, Asimenos G, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program., Green ED, Batzoglou S, Sidow A. Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence. Genome Res. 2005 Jul;15(7):901-13. PMID: 15965027; PMC: PMC1172034; DOI: 10.1101/gr.3577405

Pollard KS, Hubisz MJ, Rosenbloom KR, Siepel A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res. 2010 Jan;20(1):110-21. PMID: 19858363; PMC: PMC2798823

Siepel A, Haussler D. Phylogenetic Hidden Markov Models. In: Nielsen R, editor. Statistical Methods in Molecular Evolution. New York: Springer; 2005. pp. 325-351. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-27733-1_12

Siepel A, Pollard KS, and Haussler D. New methods for detecting lineage-specific selection. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 2006), pp. 190-205. DOI: 10.1007/11732990_17