NOTE:
Before using these data, verify that the CSpec version numbers here
match the latest version on the
ClinGen CSpec registry.
These data are for research purposes only. While the ClinGen data are
open to the public, users seeking information about a personal medical or
genetic condition are urged to consult with a qualified physician for
diagnosis and for answers to personal medical questions.
The tracks listed here contain data from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2
Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation
Guidelines for BRCA1/BRCA1 Version 1.1.0. The ENIGMA VCEP has adapted
the ACMG-AMP codes for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. These include the
codes PVS1 (modified PVS1 decision tree), PS3/BS3 (functional data),
PP4/BP5 (multifactorial data), PM5_PTC (PTC data, at exon level),
the (potentially) clinically important functional domains defined by
ENIGMA, and prediction programs (SpliceAI and BayesDel for PP3/BP4).
The data required for the application of these ENIGMA codes are displayed in 5 data tracks:
The most up-to-date VCEP specifications for application of ACMG/AMP criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are freely available at the ClinGen Criteria Specification (CSpec) Registry. This registry is intended to provide access to the Criteria Specifications used and applied by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels and biocurators in the classification of variants.
These data were created and adapted from the files referenced above. Some custom scripting was employed in tasks like mapping variants, adding colors and mouseovers, and producing the desired format.
The multifactorial likelihood analysis scores were recomputed from Parsons et al. 2019 suppl table HUMU-40-1557-s001_Parson_Multicatorial.xlsx, as well as data from Caputo et al 2021, Li et al 2020, and Easton et al 2007. Variants present in both Parsons and Easton were removed from one dataset as as to only be counted once. All likelihood ratios of each matching type (Family LR, Co-occurence LR, segregation LR, pathology LR, and case control LR) were multiplied together and finally those values were then multiplied to create a combined LR score for the variant. For track creation all values were rounded to three decimal places. All individual scores can be seen in the item description page.
For the complete details on the data processing see the makedoc on GitHub.
Thank you to Luis Nassar from the Genome Browser team, Anna Benet-Pagès, Melissa Cline, and Andreas Laner for technical coordination and consultation, and to the ENIGMA consortia for making these data available.
Enigma Guidelines: https://clinicalgenome.org/affiliation/50087/
Enigma Consortium: https://enigmaconsortium.org/
Parsons MT, Tudini E, Li H, Hahnen E, Wappenschmidt B, Feliubadaló L, Aalfs CM, Agata S, Aittomäki K, Alducci E et al. Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification. Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1557-1578. PMID: 31131967; PMC: PMC6772163
Caputo SM, Golmard L, Léone M, Damiola F, Guillaud-Bataille M, Revillion F, Rouleau E, Derive N, Buisson A, Basset N et al. Classification of 101 BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance by cosegregation study: A powerful approach. Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Oct 7;108(10):1907-1923. PMID: 34597585; PMC: PMC8546044
Easton DF, Deffenbaugh AM, Pruss D, Frye C, Wenstrup RJ, Allen-Brady K, Tavtigian SV, Monteiro AN, Iversen ES, Couch FJ et al. A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Nov;81(5):873-83. PMID: 17924331; PMC: PMC2265654
Li H, LaDuca H, Pesaran T, Chao EC, Dolinsky JS, Parsons M, Spurdle AB, Polley EC, Shimelis H, Hart SN et al. Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort. Genet Med. 2020 Apr;22(4):701-708. PMID: 31853058; PMC: PMC7118020